emreakay's avatar

Emre Akay

emreakay

Member since

45

Total Reputation

2

Total Arguments

5

Total Votes for Arguments

Arguments and votes

1

its syntax is too much complicated

Share:
Read the RFC: The Pipe Operator emreakay avatar
emreakay
voted no
1

it will be beneficial for my packages

Share:
Read the RFC: Interface Default Methods emreakay avatar
emreakay
voted yes
65

For me, the most important argument is that the pipeline pattern is a tried and tested pattern, that this RFC builds upon. A couple of examples:

This RFC adds syntax to make using these kinds of pattern much more convenient.

On top of that, there's the argument that multiple modern languages support a pipe operator:

Finally, I've had numerous occasions where a pipe operator would simplify my own code — I have more than a handful real life cases where this would be useful.

Share:
Read the RFC: The Pipe Operator Contributor brent avatar
brent
voted yes
5

I personally don't need it but I guess it could be useful to people.

Share:
Read the RFC: Interface Default Methods alex avatar
alex
voted yes
55

I wrote down some thoughts on this RFC on my blog. I think it's worth rethinking our current definition of what "an interface" is. Especially since many languages are interface default methods as their way of multi-inheritance.

Share:
Read the RFC: Interface Default Methods Contributor brent avatar
brent
voted yes
RSS Feed Contribute Watch on YouTube Our License
© 2024 RFC Vote. This project is open source. Contribute and collaborate with us!