stevad's avatar

Stepanov Vadym

stevad

Member since

60

Total Reputation

2

Total Arguments

4

Total Votes for Arguments

Arguments and votes

1

The code will be easier to read

Share:
Read the RFC: new MyClass()->method() without parentheses stevad avatar
stevad
voted yes
3

Moving to C# is not a good way IMHO. We will end with classes where properties are heavily mixed with the logic before actually we see class methods.

Share:
Read the RFC: Property Hooks stevad avatar
stevad
voted no
83

With First-class callable syntax available since 8.1, it would now be possible to write it as below, which is much better then string names of functions:

$result = "Hello World"
    |> htmlentities(...)
    |> str_split(...)
    |> fn($x) => array_map(strtoupper(...), $x)
    |> fn($x) => array_filter($x, fn($v) => $v != 'O');
Share:
Read the RFC: The Pipe Operator pronskiy avatar
pronskiy
voted yes
64

For me, the most important argument is that the pipeline pattern is a tried and tested pattern, that this RFC builds upon. A couple of examples:

This RFC adds syntax to make using these kinds of pattern much more convenient.

On top of that, there's the argument that multiple modern languages support a pipe operator:

Finally, I've had numerous occasions where a pipe operator would simplify my own code — I have more than a handful real life cases where this would be useful.

Share:
Read the RFC: The Pipe Operator Contributor brent avatar
brent
voted yes
RSS Feed Contribute Watch on YouTube Our License
© 2024 RFC Vote. This project is open source. Contribute and collaborate with us!