Property Hooks

Developers often use methods to wrap and guard access to object properties. There are several highly common patterns for such logic, which in practice may be verbose to implement repeatedly. Alternatively, developers may use __get and __set to intercept reads and writes generically, but that is a sledge-hammer approach that intercepts all undefined (and some defined) properties unconditionally. Property hooks provide a more targeted, purpose-built tool for common property interactions.

class User 
{
    public string $name {
        set {
            if (strlen($value) === 0) {
                throw new ValueError("Name must be non-empty");
            }
            $this->name = $value;
        }
    }
 
    public function __construct(string $name) {
        $this->name = $name;
    }
}

You can play around with them on 3v4l.org

Click the bar to cast your vote!
59%
41%
1

Though I'd prefer only allowing the syntax with parentheses like set($value)

Share:
micheljonkman avatar
micheljonkman
voted yes
1

I like it

Share:
indigoram89 avatar
indigoram89
voted yes
1

Makes it more readable.

Share:
eugen avatar
eugen
voted yes
1

I do believe this has merit and uses cases, but I agree that value objects would cover this better and there are other things the developers could put their time towards

Share:
nathan avatar
nathan
voted no
1

This RFC needs a re-work. While I support the idea, I don't think this is the right approach. The fact that the RFC is so long is a massive red flag. For example there are 4 different ways to define hooks:

class User
{
    public string $username {
        set(string $value) {
            $this->username = strtolower($value);
        }
    }
}
class User
{
    public string $username {
        set(string $value) {
            $field = strtolower($value);
        }
    }
}
class User
{
    public string $username {
        set => strtolower($value);
    }
}
class User
{
    public function __construct(
        public string $username { set => strtolower($value); }
    ) {}
}

Why?!

This is not what PHP needs.

Share:
moebrowne avatar
moebrowne
voted no
1

I enjoy using set/get hooks in C# and strongly believe they are truly useful. Also, having them in interfaces is excellent!

Share:
baldie avatar
baldie
voted yes
1

Even if you won't use this yourselve, it will allow libraries and frameworks to do some really cool stuff. LGTM!

Share:
sandermuller avatar
sandermuller
voted yes
1

I've always envied C# developers for this feature in C#, I've been using __get() and __set() methods to achieve it

Share:
hsemix avatar
hsemix
voted yes
1

It's hard to read.

Share:
bYemma avatar
bYemma
voted no
1

This RFC does not solve any issue, that cannot be solved right now with almost the same code, and makes the code harder to read. Beside this, this syntax invites developers to mix concerns.

Share:
im-a-teapot avatar
im-a-teapot
voted no
1

Getters and setters are more and more considered bad : https://www.infoworld.com/article/2073723/why-getter-and-setter-methods-are-evil.html

This features feels like a C# fix applied on PHP which I don't like. We should focus on designing better classes, not fix a bad pattern.

Share:
trehinos avatar
trehinos
voted no
1

i think it went too far with the virtuals

<?php

class User
 {
    public string $name = 'default'
     {
        set
         {
            if (strlen($value) === 0)
             {
                throw new ValueError("Name must be non-empty");
             }
            $field = ucfirst($value);
         }
        get
         {
            notifyMutationObserver();
            return $this->name;
         }
     }
    public string $badIdeaNoSetterVirdualProp
     {
        get
         {
            return $this->name;
         }
        // set ERROR! I don't like this idea...
     }
    public readonly array $lazy
     {
         get
          {
             return $this->lazy = getBigData();
          }
        // set NO! see declaration, its readonly
      }
    public function __construct(string $name)
     {
        $this->name = $name;
        unset($this->lazy);
     }
 }

$u = new User('roman');
var_dump($u->name);
Share:
yarns avatar
yarns
voted no
1

I prefer the addition of these types of features to the language. Small changes, which in principle will only be used for very specific cases. But in the end they serve to reduce hundreds of lines of superfluous code and make the code easier to read.

Share:
mmarquez avatar
mmarquez
voted yes
1

Any boilerplate that can go should go

Share:
richard4339 avatar
richard4339
voted yes
1

Is a type of writing properties that has also established itself very well in other languages, I would love to see this also in PHP

Share:
ddegasperi avatar
ddegasperi
voted yes

Check out another RFCs

The Pipe Operator

The "pipe operator" |> allows you to chain multiple function calls in a more convenient way.

92
268 yes
130 no
Short Closures 2.0

This RFC proposes a way to have multi-line short closures — closures that don't need explicit use statements, but can still have multiple lines and a return statement.

101
373 yes
66 no
new MyClass()->method() without parentheses

Chain method on newly created objects without parentheses

45
75 yes
15 no
RSS Feed Contribute Watch on YouTube Our License
© 2024 RFC Vote. This project is open source. Contribute and collaborate with us!