Short Closures 2.0

Read the RFC
101
373 yes
66 no

This RFC proposes a way to have multi-line short closures — closures that don't need explicit use statements, but can still have multiple lines and a return statement.

Click the bar to cast your vote!
85%
15%
1

it will increase code readability to sky)

Share:
Loafer19 avatar
Loafer19
voted yes
1

Just for the sake of code readability improvements & not needing to use the use keyword, It has my full support. Other languages have solved the issue, why not PHP aswell?

Share:
medabkari avatar
medabkari
voted yes
1

use(...) can be shortened easily.

Share:
ucansutlac avatar
ucansutlac
voted yes
1

Would love to have the elegance of short closures in PHP 🙏

Share:
Laravel driesvints avatar
driesvints
voted yes
1

Being possible to create closures that share the scope would be a game changer because it would mean less work and headaches with the use() block that in some cases if you don't pay attention it could lead to a lot of time waste on refactors and maintenance in code.

I think that with this, we would be able to write cleaner code that's easier to understand!

Share:
wendell_adriel avatar
wendell_adriel
voted yes
1

As many have already said, this is a common feature in other languages. As it stands, PHP has a half-baked version of short closures since introducing arrow functions. This is the natural next step.

Share:
Laravel jbrooksuk avatar
jbrooksuk
voted yes
1

It would be far more convenient, especially when code that starts as a short closure needs to do more, which is often the case, temporarily, when debugging. It will also help developers coming to PHP from other languages. I don't often find value from use () scoping either, but we'll still have the option when needed.

Share:
jessarcher avatar
jessarcher
voted yes
1

It improves the readability and usability of closures

Share:
jeidison avatar
jeidison
voted yes
1

Arrow functions in PHP were an awesome addition and I would not work without it today. I wish we had the multi-line version.

Share:
jcambien avatar
jcambien
voted yes
1

Another (extended) syntax for anonymous functions. We do not need to apply closures on everything.

Share:
dsentker avatar
dsentker
voted no
1

its modern

Share:
meshackjr avatar
meshackjr
voted yes
1

This definitely makes life easier. I find myself writing a lot of anonymous functions for commands like array_map, array_filter and so on... and it really makes me sad when I realise I need to have a multi-line function body and need to get back to the default function syntax. It's a simple yet very useful feature PHP could have. Actually, I don't mind keep using the syntax like fn() => as far as it supports a multi-line body and bypasses the need for the use(...$vars) command which is also kind of annoying.

Share:
jhonatanjacinto avatar
jhonatanjacinto
voted yes
1

Short closure is a trendy syntactic-feature in many languages this days. It's easier to write and read.

Share:
zbandhan avatar
zbandhan
voted yes
1

I love this proposal. It basically makes closures up to date with other programming languages, and is sorely needed in my opinion.

Share:
thomasalrek avatar
thomasalrek
voted yes
1

as often, it's more for a question of readability that I vote "no"....I prefer by far a good code more readable than shortcut solutions

Share:
grazulex avatar
grazulex
voted no

Check out another RFCs

The Pipe Operator

The "pipe operator" |> allows you to chain multiple function calls in a more convenient way.

93
272 yes
131 no
Property Hooks

A new way of interacting with properties

70
141 yes
90 no
Asymmetric Visibility v2

A new syntax for declaring the “set” operation visibility of an object property

21
21 yes
38 no
RSS Feed Contribute Watch on YouTube Our License
© 2024 RFC Vote. This project is open source. Contribute and collaborate with us!